Airpower Blog

AIRPOWER BLOG PARTICIPATION RULES
Airpower Blog participants should observe the following rules:

Classified or Sensitive Information

The Airpower Blog is a public discussion blog serving the U.S. Military Aviation Community.  Due to the nature of the topics discussed on The Airpower Blog, please exercise discretion.  Neither articles nor comments should make reference to, or suggest the existence of, any information that resides in the Classified or Sensitive categories.  If in doubt, don’t post it.

OPSEC

Operational Security (OPSEC) considerations always apply.  Please alert the Airpower Blog moderators if you think a particular article or comment should be removed.  This is certainly applicable for OPSEC-related items.  Politely notify a commenter if a comment poses an OPSEC issue.  This also serves as a reminder to others who comment.  If the commenter reveals an ignorance of what OPSEC is, simply ignore the comment or refer the commenter to public domain information.

Comment Guidance

Ensure that any comments that you post are directly relevant to the Airpower article being discussed.  Comments that are not truly germane to the article should be avoided in order to maintain focus.  Be polite, courteous, civilized and respectful.  Do not use obscene language.  Treat the privacy of others as an absolute.

 

Submitting Your Own Articles to the Blog

  • Use a clear and catchy title.
  • Structure your article with an introduction, body and conclusion.
  • Write well.  Pay attention to spelling, grammar, and style.  If an acronym is used, please use the full text version when the term is first used, followed by the acronym in parentheses, as demonstrated in the OPSEC paragraph above.  
  • Don’t misquote, be sure of your facts, and cite your sources.
  • No copyright infringements, please.  Observe copyright when posting content from other sources.
  • Do not use obscene language or adult content
  • Do not submit commercial messages or advertising.

 

Report Misuse/Abuse

To report abuse or misuse of the Airpower Blog, please contact the moderators and include a link to the comments in question.
The Airpower Blog reserves the right to delete, move, or edit any comments that it deems unsuitable for the Blog.
If you have a complaint about one of our actions such as deleting, moving, or editing your comments, don’t air it on the Blog; rather, please send us a message.

Interested in submitting an article? Click the link to get started.
Need help or want to report misuse? Click the link to get started.

Army aviation professionals share lessons learned

CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas – Amidst the cooling weather by the bay, the Army Aviation Association of America hosted the 14th Luther G. Jones Army Aviation Depot Forum at the Solomon P. Ortiz International Center, Corpus Christi, Oct. 24-25. Hundreds of aviation...

read more

U.S. Army Flight Tests Optionally Piloted Helicopter

The U.S. Army has flight-tested the Sikorsky Autonomy Research Aircraft (SARA), a Sikorsky S-76B modified as an optionally piloted vehicle (OPV) demonstrator. This marked the first time that non-Sikorsky pilots had operated the SARA as an OPV aircraft. For the Army’s...

read more

Joint Investigation

Brig. Gen. Edward L. Vaughan is the Air National Guard Special Assistant to Maj. Gen. Scott F. Smith, the Director of Training and Readiness, Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, Arlington, Va. The directorate, encompassing seven...

read more

Heading into F-35 operational tests, threat of delays loom

WASHINGTON — The F-35 is set to move into operational testing next month — a major milestone that precedes the Pentagon’s decision on whether to begin full-rate production of the jet — but there are already signs that it may not be able to complete testing on time....

read more

Forget the A-10 Warthog: The Army Wants the F-35

The US Army wants the F-35 to support its ground troops. It’s that simple. We hear volumes of information about the Marine Corps vertical-take-off-and-landing F-35B, Navy carrier-launched F-35C and Air Force F-35A – but what does the Army think of the emerging...

read more